Jesse,
Thanks for your
response. I am glad to hear that DPR is in the final stages of developing
regulations for Dog Exercise Areas in the DC. Unfortunately after the initial
draft we have heard nothing regarding the potential places or when the next
community briefing will be. Since the rules and regulations in the first draft
left nearly the entirely district out of scope for such areas, we the owners of
dogs were left very worried about the future of dog
parks.
Regarding the Upshur
park, Evelyn Woods (CC’ed in your email) responded to a fellow resident that
(textual from email below) ‘As such this
defunct playground at Allison and
The big concern we have
is why the code is being enforced so harsh against dog owners and not against
other residents. An example is church parking, where the issue exists and DC
decided to not enforce parking laws to these residents (and many times suburb
residents).
Also inside your parks
drug traffic, sex and alcohol consumption takes place. Following your
reasoning shouldn’t you have those parks ‘..be closed as we could not control use
there..’?
So why enforce some
laws and not others? Probably because there are more church goers than
responsible dog owners…
This makes me
personally feel as a second class resident of the district, especially when we
were using a park where we did not displace anybody or bother anybody. As said
by Ms Woods below, ‘dog walkers were using
the playground there as a de facto dog park’. So why should we be
penalized? Shouldn’t DPR go after dog walkers instead? They are running a
business in DPR property after all.
I wish that DC will
have the same flexibility with us than with other groups in our community, you
tolerate drugs, alcohol and sex in DC parks, but you do not tolerate off leash
dogs in a fence area.
Some flexibility should
be there at least such parks are established.
Sincerely,
Franco
Primavesi
------------
From: < customerservice.
To: <>
Subject: Re: Webform.DPR.
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:30:34 +0000
Dear Mr. ,
The department received
several phone calls from the citizens who reside at
Allison and Arkansas, that contrary to the regulations, dog walkers were
using
the playground there as a de facto dog park –
creating among other things, a
disturbance. This
playground was once used by the Sharpe school, but seems to
have gone into disuse when they erected their own on the hill. DPR
policy 2.103
clearly states that no dogs are allowed on
or near playgrounds, athletic fields,
picnic areas or
community gardens – with or without a leash. Dog owners, and
especially dog-walkers have been flouting these rules for years and
creating
unautho! rized d og-parks throughout the city.
The current debate regarding the
creation of legal
dog-parks seems to have drawn the attention of citizens who
have hitherto been silent regarding this flouting of the rules, and like
you
they too have been in touch with the Mayor's
office, their respective Council
members and their
ANC's. As you may know, the criteria for the creation of dog
parks are currently under review with input from community groups from
every
Ward, the Council, DOH, MPD, etc. Until this is
finalized and a decision is
taken as to where dog parks
will be situated, DPR will follow the current rules.
As
such this defunct playground at Allison and
to be demolished and fence removed in the next few
weeks.
Thank you for your interest in the DC
Department of Parks and Recreation.
Sincerely,
Evelyn Woods
Customer Service Manager
From: Rounds,
Jesse (DPR) [mailto:jesse.rounds@dc.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:51
PM
To:
Cc: Woods, Evelyn (DPR)
Subject:
Mr.
Primavesi,
Thank you for your concern about
dogs and dog exercise areas in DC Parks. As you may or may not know the
Department of Parks and Recreation is now in the final stages of developing
regulations for Dog Exercise Areas in the
We felt it was important to move
forward cautiously. Since we started the process, a counter-response to
dog-owners need for dog exercise areas has arisen. It is important that we
allay the fears of this portion of the community by making considered
decisions. A lot of the very negative response to dogs off leash in recent
months have come as a result of this. When we are asked to respond to a
call of “dogs off-leash” and we find dogs off-leash we are bound to respond
based on the rules and regulations found in DC code.
Unfortunately, the fenced area
within
I was not party to any communication
stating that this fenced in area would be taken down. If this was an
official communication from DPR, I apologize for the confusion. Two
members of the Planning and Design staff have examined the space and come to the
conclusion that the fence should remain for the time-being. We are
exploring options for this space and I assure you that any and all decisions
will be subject to public meetings and comments.
Finally, I’d like to address a
concern that seems to have started early in the Dog Exercise Area process.
Residents seem very sure that DPR and the District in general are against dogs
and dog owners. I assure you that nothing could be further from the
truth. Simply from the management standpoint DPR has been pressing for dog
parks for some years. In parks, particularly urban parks, uses do not
always mix well. Thus, we have sought ways to accommodate dog parks to
reduce pressure on open spaces that are regularly used by children. From a
community building standpoint, as you note, dog parks have proven to be great
facilitators. Thus we have a strong impetus to move forward.
If you have any questions or would
like to discuss this further, please don’t hesitate to contact me.
Thanks,
Jesse
Jesse
Rounds
Community
Planner
D.C. Department of Parks
and Recreation
(o)
202/671-0416
(f)
202/671-2796